Consonant Articulation and Lexical Stress in Georgian EFL Learners: Phonological Patterns and Pedagogical Implications
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22333/ijme.2025.10427Keywords:
Georgian EFL learners, Pronunciation challenges, Vowels, consonants, and stress, L1 transfer and orthographic interference, Pronunciation pedagogyAbstract
This study investigates segmental and suprasegmental pronunciation challenges encountered by Georgian learners of English as a Foreign Language (EFL), focusing on consonants, and stress. Adopting a mixed-methods approach, it combines IPA-based audio analysis, frequency tracking, and learner surveys to explore both observed difficulties and students’ perceptions of their underlying causes.
Data were collected from 30 B1-level first-year university students enrolled in a Practical Phonetics course at Tbilisi State University during the 2024 Fall–2025 Spring academic year. The analysis reveals systematic inconsistencies in consonant production. Frequent consonantal issues are most commonly manifested through interdental fricative substitution, /v/–/w/ confusion, final consonant devoicing, and misarticulation of English /r/, largely influenced by the Georgian trilled /r/.
The findings suggest that these patterns stem primarily from L1 transfer, orthographic interference, and restricted exposure to authentic English input. Grounded in Second Language Acquisition (SLA) frameworks—specifically Flege’s Speech Learning Model and the Orthographic Interference Hypothesis—the study proposes pedagogical strategies emphasizing explicit pronunciation instruction and phonological awareness within communicative EFL contexts.
References
Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Harvard University Press.
Baker, A., & Burri, M. (2016). Feedback on Second Language Pronunciation: A Case Study of EAP Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(6). https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2016v41n6.1
Bassetti, B. (2006). Orthographic input and second language phonology. Second Language Research, 22(4), 379–393. https://doi.org/10.1191/0267658306sr285oa
Bassetti, B., & Atkinson, D. (2015). Orthographic interference in second language pronunciation learning. Language Teaching, 48(3), 332–351. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444814000330
Celce-Murcia, M., Brinton, D. M., & Goodwin, J. M. (1996). Teaching pronunciation: A reference for teachers of English to speakers of other languages. Cambridge University Press.
Center for Applied Linguistics. (n.d.). Bibliographies: Second language acquisition. CAELA – ESL Resources. https://www.cal.org/caela/esl_resources/bibliographies/sla.html
Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (2005). Second language accent and pronunciation teaching: A research-based approach. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 379–397. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588486
DeKeyser, R. M. (1997). Beyond explicit rule learning: Automatizing second language morphosyntax. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(2), 195–221. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263197002047
Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 233–277). Timonium, MD: York Press.
Flege, J. E. (2003). Speech learning in a second language. In D. Birdsong (Ed.), Second language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis (pp. 239–273). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Gordon, J., Darcy, I., & Ewert, D. (2012). Phonetic instruction for second language learners: Evidence from the classroom. Iowa State Digital Press.
Han, Z. (2004). Fossilization in adult second language acquisition. Multilingual Matters.
Levis, J. M. (2005). Changing contexts and shifting paradigms in pronunciation teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 369–377. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588485
Lado, R. (1957). Linguistics across cultures: Applied linguistics for language teachers. University of Michigan Press.
Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). Academic Press.
Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(1), 37–66. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263197001034
Major, R. C. (2001). Foreign accent: The phenomenon of non-native speech. Routledge.
Mora, J. C., & Mora-Plaza, I. (2023). From Research in the Lab to Pedagogical Practices in the EFL Classroom: The Case of Task-Based Pronunciation Teaching. Education Sciences, 13(10), 1042. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13101042
Pennington, M. C. (1998). Phonology in English language teaching: An international approach. Routledge.
Rastelli, C. (2018). Orthographic interference in EFL learners: Implications for pronunciation instruction. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 4(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.4.1.01ras
Roach, P. (2009). English phonetics and phonology: A practical course (4th ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Saito, K., & Lyster, R. (2012). Effects of form-focused instruction on L2 pronunciation development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34(2), 241–271. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263111000482
Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 10(3), 209–231. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1972.10.1-4.209
Swan, M., & Smith, B. (2001). Learner English: A teacher’s guide to interference and other problems (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) - Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International License, which allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their personal website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to a repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.