VP-Hypostasis in the Russian Green Man (ихтамнет)-Discourse

Authors

  • Zakharia Pourtskhvanidze PHD, Independent researcher, Frankfurt

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22333/ijme.2024.9022

Keywords:

Concept, Stereotypes, National character, Multicultural aspects, Conceptual worldview

Abstract

Abstract: This article analyzes the linguistic phenomenon of VP-hypostasis within the context of the Russian discourse surrounding ixtamnet (“they are not there”)—a phrase that emerged during the Ukraine conflict as a discursive tool to obscure the presence of Russian troops. VP-hypostases are syntactic constructions that morphologically resemble phrases but function discursively as self-contained units of meaning. The author demonstrates how ixtamnet serves as a discourse trigger, generating collective knowledge and legitimizing political narratives. Using corpus linguistic methods, particularly word and phrase embeddings, semantic networks are revealed that show the term’s discursive linkage to concepts such as “Donbass,” “Wagner Group,” and “mercenary.” The study highlights the performative and ironic character of such hypostases in political language and contrasts them with similar constructions in other languages. VP-hypostases are interpreted as discourse-focusing markers that encode complex social meanings within minimal linguistic form. Keywords: VP-hypostasis, discourse linguistics, corpus linguistics, word embeddings, discourse trigger, language ideology, phrase formation.

References

Benko, V. (2014). Aranea: Yet another family of (warez) web corpora. Retrieved from http://unesco.uniba.sk/aranea/

Bubenhofer, N. (2008). Calculating discourse? Towards a corpus linguistic discourse analysis. In J. Spitzmüller & I. H. Warnke (Eds.), Methoden der Diskurslinguistik: Sprachwissenschaftliche Zugänge zur transtextuellen Ebene (pp. 407–434). De Gruyter.

Bubenhofer, N. (2009). Language use patterns: Corpus linguistics as a method of discourse and cultural analysis. De Gruyter.

Bubenhofer, N. (2013). Quantitatively informed qualitative discourse analysis: Corpus linguistic approaches to individual texts and series. In K. S. Roth & C. Spiegel (Eds.), Applied discourse linguistics: Fields, problems, perspectives (pp. 109–134). Akademie Verlag.

Bublitz, H. (2001). Difference and integration: On the discourse-analytical reconstruction of the rule structures of social reality. In R. Keller, A. Hirseland, W. Schneider, & W. Viehöver (Eds.), Handbuch sozialwissenschaftliche Diskursanalyse: Vol. 1. Theorien und Methoden (pp. 225– 260). Leske + Budrich.

Linke, A. (2003). History of concepts – History of discourse – History of language use. In C. Dutt (Ed.), Herausforderungen der Begriffsgeschichte (pp. 39–49). Universitätsverlag Winter.

Neumann, W., & Dobbert, S. (2017, February 6). Russia: Putin’s mercenaries. Die Zeit.

Rüesch, A. (2018, January 18). Russia’s private armies operate in a legal vacuum. Neue Zürcher Zeitung, p. 5.

Schlegel, H. (2002). Formation, meaning and use of the Russian verbal aspect: Part 1. Theoretical foundations. Verlag Otto Sagner.

Schmidt-Brücken, D. (2016). Discourse. Universitätsverlag Winter.

Spitzmüller, J., & Warnke, I. H. (2011). Discourse linguistics: An introduction to theory and methods of transsexual language analysis. De Gruyter.

Tereick, J. (2016). Climate change in discourse: Multimodal discourse analysis of crossmedia corpora. De Gruyter.

Ullrich, P. (2008). Discourse analysis, discourse research, discourse theory: An introduction and overview. In U. Freikamp et al. (Eds.), Critique with method? Research methods and social criticism (pp. 19–31). Dietz Verlag.

Wichter, S. (1999). Gespräch, Diskurs und Stereotypie. Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik, 27(3), 261–278. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfgl.1999.27.3.261

Downloads

Published

2024-12-15

How to Cite

Pourtskhvanidze, Z. (2024). VP-Hypostasis in the Russian Green Man (ихтамнет)-Discourse. International Journal of Multilingual Education, 25(2), 27–52. https://doi.org/10.22333/ijme.2024.9022

Issue

Section

Articles